JOHN BOORMAN AND THE DEVIL: anatomy of a fiasco

Photo caption: Linda Blair in JOHN BOORMAN AND THE DEVIL. Courtesy of Yellow Veil Pictures.

John Boorman and the Devil tells the true story of an all-time movie-making fiasco – and it’s more entertaining than the original film could have ever hoped to be. That 1977 bomb was The Exorcist II: The Heretic, which I correctly judged at the time to unfathomably bad. In John Boorman and the Devil, Boorman and his collaborators explain, in their own words, what happened.

The Exorcist became a monster hit in 1973, making an unexpected fortune for Warner Bros. The studio, seeing others profit with Exorcist ripoffs, wanted to cash in with a genuine Exorcist sequel. Trouble was, both The Exorcist’s director William Friedkin and writer Peter Blatty felt cheated by Warners and were embroiled in bitter litigation.

The studio courted director John Boorman, who was at his height of marketability, having just made Point Blank and Deliverance, two great films that have since been added to the National Film Registry. Boorman, however, was bored by the idea of making a horror movie; instead, he wanted to make a trippy art movie, as he had with Zardoz. Unfortunately, Boorman’s vision, as reflected in the continually rewritten screenplay by Rospo Pallenburg, manifested itself as incoherent cinema. (I remember being completely puzzled as I watched Max Von Stdow wandering through an Ethiopian desert,)

Of course, the target audience for the film was the folks who had enjoyed The Exorcist. Because The Exorcist was a horror movie, they were understandably expecting Exorcist II would be another horror movie. Disappointed by the lack of horror, confused and bored, Exorcist II: The Heretic was greeted with hostility. and then ridicule, and finally laughed off the nation’s movie screens.

John Boorman in JOHN BOORMAN AND THE DEVIL. Courtesy of Yellow Veil Pictures.

In John Boorman and the Devil, director David Kittredge brings us interviews with Boorman himself, stars Linda Blair and Louise Fletcher, the screenwriter, the assistant directors, a camera operator and the script supervisor. We even hear from the biologist in charge of wrangling the thousands of locusts. Boorman is a good sport and reflects on his biggest personal disaster with a minimum of defensiveness or self-pity. Blair and Fletcher are delightful raconteurs.

It didn’t help that Exorcist II: The Heretic is filled with unintentionally funny moments. At one point, Linda Blair tap dances. Wearing an African tribal headdress, James Earl Jones spits out a whole tomato. Even today, Blair and Fletcher burst out laughing at the name of the movie’s demon – Pazuzu.

Boorman dryly recounts advice he received from the great director David Lean: “Everybody makes failures. Just don’t make a famous one.”

I had heard William Friedkin taking delight in a hilarious anecdote about a disastrous Pasadena test screening of Exorcist II. Because Friedkin wished the sequel and its studio ill, I had presumed that he had embellished the incident – but John Boorman and the Devil brings an eyewitness who corroborates Friedkin’s version.

And here’s another tidbit – Boorman wanted to cast then emerging star Christopher Walken, but the studio insisted on big name Richard Burton. Burton turned in a one-dimensional performance, relying on his majestic voice and gravitas and little else.

John Boorman and the Devil is streaming on Amazon, AppleTV and Fandango. On October 9, Turner Classic Movies is showing John Boorman and the Devil in a double feature with Exorcist II: The Heretic; watch the first and skip thr second.

BE NATURAL: THE UNTOLD STORY OF ALICE GUY-BLACHE: every cinephile should know this

The documentary Be Natural: The Untold Story of Alice Guy-Blache pulls us out of ignorance about one of the most important pioneers of cinema. Alice Guy was one of the first movie directors, one of the first producers and one of the first studio heads. She was one of the inventors of movie comedy, use of color, special effects and a host of other aspects of filmmaking that we take for granted today. She worked in all three centers of early filmmaking – Paris, Fort Lee, New Jersey and Hollywood. And she was a woman.

Alice Guy had been almost erased from history precisely because – and only because – she was a woman. But if we don’t know about Alice Guy, we are as ignorant as if we didn’t know about the Lumieres and D.W. Griffith. This is essential movie history.

Fortunately, more and more of her films are being rediscovered – found, properly credited and preserved. At the bottom of this post, you can watch one of her films, The Consequences of Feminism. I didn’t even know that the word “feminism” was extant 114 years ago, but the film still has #MeToo topicality. It’s a withering parody of gender roles and male entitlement. In the film, men and women have taken each others’ conventional gender roles. Men perform the thankless household drudgery while the women smoke, drink and play pool. Throughout, the women are outrageously sexually harassing the men, kind of like Mad Men in reverse. Of course, the men finally rebel at all the mistreatment.

Be Natural: The Untold Story of Alice Guy-Blache is currently free on WATCH TCM and can be streamed from Amazon, iTunes, Vudu, YouTube and Google Play.

Here’s the entire seven minute film from 1906: The Consequences of Feminism: