JIMMY: Jimmy deserved a better biopic

Photo caption: KJ APA in JIMMY. Courtesy of Fathom Events.

Jimmy tells the story of the actor James Stewart’s courageous WW II experience and projects the impact it must have had on him personally and professionally. Stewart’s is a great and oft overlooked story, and deserves a better film than Jimmy.

As depicted in Jimmy, Stewart, with a recent Oscar win, was riding high in Hollywood when the war broke out, enjoying a huge salary and dating other movie stars. According to Jimmy, Stewart had some initial ambivalence about joining the US military, which I don’t believe was historical. Having been refused enlistment before the war because he was too skinny, Stewart volunteered again within days of Pearl Harbor, and, already a pilot, quickly received a commission in the Army Air Corps, the predecessor of the Air Force. Many Hollywood types served in WW II, but it was very unusual for star actors to be exposed to combat on the front lines. At age 33, Stewart could have served in a desk job, a US posting or avoided the military altogether.

Jimmy accurately describes Stewart’s wartime service, and it’s difficult to overstate his bravery. Stewart piloted B-24 Liberators, the heavy bombers that the Allies used in the strategic bombing designed to degrade the Nazi war effort. Because of the RAF’s losses in the Battle of Britain, British bombers flew the safer night missions, and the Americans, including Stewart, flew the much more dangerous daytime missions. Each mission, flying through hundreds of miles of flak and fighter attacks, was terrifying. The fatality rate for heavy bomber crews in the war was 23%, so the flyers knew that, after just a few missions, they were essentially playing Russian Roulette. Jimmy Stewart flew twenty combat missions.

Every bomber wing commander, including Stewart, had to order men to their deaths and watch many of their friends dying in shocking and grisly ways. Informed by our modern understanding of PTSD, the Jimmy screenplay has a tortured Jimmy anguishing just out of sight of his men, and seeking support from a fictional aristocratic war widow (Kara Killmer).

I doubt that it happened that way. I grew up in a world where essentially all the dads were WW II vets, so I’m very familiar with the men of that generation. When they felt strong emotions, they repressed them and self-medicated. They sure didn’t get all angsty, even though that would have been appropriate. Even in the 1960s, they didn’t talk about what happened to them in WW II.

My problem with Jimmy is that the screenplay often resorts to corny cliches, exacerbated by a manipulative score that wells the music in the big moments.

None of this is the fault of Australian actor KJ Apa, who must have been cast because of his lanky frame and his uncanny ability to capture Stewart’s voice and idiosyncratic speech patterns. Apa captures Jimmy Stewart navigating those hellish experiences. In fact, there isn’t a bad performance in the film, even though Max Casella (Frank Capra), Neal McDonough (Jimmy’s dad) and Jason Alexander (Louis B. Mayer) are the only cast members I had seen before.

Before the war, Jimmy Stewart was already an A-list star, with one of the greatest screwball comedies, The Philadelphia Story, the seminal rom com, The Shop Around the Corner, the weeper Made for Each Other and the uplifting (if naive and corny) Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.

Jimmy makes the case that combat trauma informed a much darker Stewart performance in It’s a Wonderful Life. And, after all, in even that most Feel Good of all Feel Good movies, Stewart plays a guy who is suicidal. I think there may something to that. In his more accomplished post-war career, Stewart showed he could play characters that were bitter, disillusioned, and obsessive in Winchester 73, Rear Window and Anatomy of a Murder, and, of course, completely twisted in Vertigo.

Jimmy was financed and is distributed by Fathom Events, a joint venture of the AMC, Regal and Cinemark theater chains, which produces content for the theaters. It is now playing in those theaters.

POSSIBLE LOVE: four people, social inequality and a trauma

Photo caption: Zo In-sung, Cho Yeo-Jeong, Jeon Do-yeon and Sul Kyung-gu in POSSIBLE LOVE. Courtesy of Netflix.

In director and co-writer Chang-dong Lee’s quietly powerful Possible Love, two couples navigate a new friendship under the shadow of social inequality and one character’s long-simmering trauma. The four individuals, each molded by their backgrounds, navigate changes in their lives, right up to the inevitable eruption.

Right away, we meet the ever-bubbly Mi-ok (Jeon Do-yeon), an over-sharing chatterbox who works in a workshop that makes surgical masks. Opposites attract, and she’s married to the impassive Ho-Seok (Sul Kyung-gu), unemployed after losing his heavy industry job in a corporate restructuring. Something is up with Ho-Seok, who drives the family to the funeral of a former co-worker, who has taken his life after he layoffs; initially, Ho-Seok refuses to leave the car, only to finally enter and embarrass Mi-ok by drinking too much and making a scene.

Ho-Seok had worked for Korea’s largest manufacturing company, where jobs were thought to bring lifetime security. The workers fought the layoffs with a strike that was broken by brutal government violence. The breach of the social contract, the sudden plunge into economic insecurity, the defeat of a righteous cause and the violence have traumatized the entire work force, and every interaction between the former colleagues is charged. Many attend a therapy group to work out their feelings, but Ho-seok refuses to join them.

The documentary filmmaker Ye-ji (Cho Yeo-Jeong of Parasite) is shooting a film about the impact of the layoffs. She spots the kerfuffle at the funeral and engages with Mi-ok, who becomes a willing participant in the documentary. Ye-ji is earnest about telling the workers’ story, even though she herself is affluent, what Americans would call a limousine liberal. Despite the class difference, Ye-ji and Mi-ok hit it off, and a friendship quickly evolves.

Ye-ji is married to the charming and handsome Sang-woo (Zo In-sung), who has the easy confidence of those born into great wealth. Sang-woo is friendly and generous, and goes along with his wife’s new friendship, taking the two coupkes out to dinner and then even hosting them for a weekend at his family’s seaside retreat, an impressive estate with a private beach and a caretaker.

Mi-ok and Ho-Seok bring their ten-year-old son Cheol (Jung Seol), who slips around in the background, absorbing lessons about adult behavior.

Is Ye-ji exploiting Mi-ok’s family for her film? Can Ye-ji and Mi-ok maintain their friendship over the abyss of unequal means? Will Ho-seok reveal the most painful source of his depression? Will Ho-seok explode in volcanic violence? Does Sang-woo have a more fundamental role in the story than first apparent?

Zo In-sung, Jeon Do-yeon, Cho Yeo-Jeong and Sul Kyung-gu in POSSIBLE LOVE. Courtesy of Netflix.

Chang-dong Lee masterfully tells this story, revealing the inner perspectives of his characters through flashbacks and brilliant details like Mi-ok surreptitious pricing of Ye-ji’s handbag and an old whistle from Sang-woo’s childhood. Possible Love is a two hour, forty-four minute slow burn that never drags. I tagged Lee’s earlier film Burning as “hypnotically compelling”, which would apply to Possible Love, too. I embrace Howard Hawks’ definition of a great movie – three great scenes and no bad ones“, and Possible Love easily meets that test.

Possible Love was Lee’s contribution to a series of riffs on Krzysztof Kieslowski’s iconic Dekalog (referring to the Ten Commandments) by international directors. Indeed, Mi-ok’s reaction to Ye-ji’s affluence and suave husband falls within the commandment Thou shalt not covet, but Possible Love explores much more territory than envy.

Possible Love was nominated for the best film at the Toronto International Film Festival and won the best film award at the Venice Film Festival. Its current Metacritic rating is a sky high 95. Possible Love is Korea’s submission for the Best International Feature Oscar.

This is one of the Best Movies of 2026 – So Far (and topping my list right now). Possible Love is streaming on Netflix, where you can watch it subtitled and/or dubbed in English.

BITTER CHRISTMAS: melodrama within melodrama

Photo caption: Barbara Lennie and Victoria Luengo in BITTER CHRISTMAS. Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics.

In Bitter Christmas, writer-director Pedro Almodóvar explores the ethics of turning someone else’s life into art. And he does so by embedding a movie within a movie.

We start out following Elsa (Barbara Lennie) in 2004. Elsa is a filmmaker early in her career, facing issues with her job direction, her relationship with her boyfriend and drama in the lives of her gal pals.

Eventually, we learn that Elsa’s story is a screenplay being written in 2025 by the filmmaker Raul (Leonardo Sabaraglia). Raul has intended to write a script based on his own panic attack in 2004, and the fictional Elsa is his alter ego. He’s experiencing difficulty in putting his story together, and now his longtime assistant Monica (Aitana Sanchez-Gijon) is taking an indefinite sabbatical. Monica will be the emotional support of a friend who has experienced a tragic loss.

Bitter Christmas toggles between the 2025 story and the 2004 story Raul is inventing. Raul’s story starts absorbing occurrences in the real lives of Monica and her friends. Is it a betrayal? A violation of privacy? An inspiration for art? Eventually Monica will confront Raul.

Pedro Almodóvar is one of the filmmakers that I admire the most, but Bitter Christmas is not one of his masterpieces like Talk to Her or Broken Embraces. Still, even minor Almodovar is good. As usual, the melodrama is vivid and the female performances are outstanding.

Bitter Christmas played at Cannes, and I screened it for the Mill Valley Film Festival. It opens in theaters this weekend.

Movies to See Right Now

Photo caption: Nathan Fielder in YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING. Courtesy of A24.

This week on The Movie Gourmet a new review of the year’s best movie so far – the brilliant documentary You Can See Everything. I also posted a review of the insightful documentary Heathens, which explores the trauma suffered by people who leave their church communities.

REMEMBRANCE

Patrick Stewart as Sejanus in I, CLAUDIUS

Patrick Stewart had a significant career with the Royal Shakespeare Company before immotalizing himself in the role of Picard in the Star Trek franchise. When PBS broadcasted the British I, Claudius series in 1977, American viewers were introduced to Stewart’s booming baritone and commanding presence. He didn’t need that voice for his indelible performance as the Soviet spymaster Karla in the 1988 Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, a role with no spoken lines. Stewart amassed an amazing 589 IMDb credits, including dozens of Star Trek and X-Men performances and a few Shakespeare roles after the age of 60. I relished his very funny performance in the 2013 Israeli caper comedy Hunting Elephants (available on Amazon, included with Prime.)

CURRENT MOVIES

Here’s the trailer for You Can See Everything.

HEATHENS: when liberation risks trauma

Scene from HEATHENS. Courtesy of Pale Blue Dot Films.

The thoughtful and insightful documentary Heathens explores the experience of people tortured by the social consequences of losing their religious faith. Directors David Cowan and Shawn Hardin introduce us to five people emotionally scarred by the hostile reactions of loved ones and peers.

Of course, the American right to choose one’s religion also protects the choice NOT to believe. But for people raised in intensely immersive religious communities, leaving a church can risk isolation, disconnection and ostracism. The sudden loss of all of one’s family and friends has to be traumatic. Much of Heathens takes place at a retreat for these trauma survivors in the Blue Ridge Mountains.

Heathens cites research that over 80 million American adults hide their religious doubts or exaggerate their religiosity. The subjects in Heathens are former Protestant evangelicals. Although there aren’t any former Catholics, Mormons, Jews or Muslims in Heathens, the insights are universal to any fundamentalist faith community which is enveloping and judgemental.

Heathens screens tonight in San Francisco at the Commonwealth Club. For future screenings, visit the Heathens website.

YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING: the truth and nothing but the truth

Photo caption: Elizabeth Holmes in YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING. Courtesy of A24.

The convention-shattering documentary You Can See Everything is ostensibly centered on Elizabeth Holmes, who, in her early 20s, sought and attained global fame as a self-made tech billionaire, until she was exposed as a fraud. But You Can See Everything is not a recounting of the Theranos scandal. Filmmaker Nathan Fielder uses Elizabeth Holmes’ desire to tell her sanitized version of that story to explore truth, fact, lies, delusion and narrative itself. The result is an ever-surprising film that is the best movie I have yet seen in 2026.

You Can See Everything kicks off 34 days before Holmes’ 11-year prison term will begin. Holmes and her partner Billy Evans have invited filmmaker Fielder to move in with their family at a San Diego beach rental. Promising total transparency, hence the film’s title, they grant Fielder and his co-director Lance Oppenheim permission to film them 24/7.

Having been convicted of fraud in federal court after a high-profile trial, Holmes still claims to be innocent. Essentially, she says that the words in her sales pitch were misinterpreted by investors, and that the media, prosecutors, Hollywood and the public have been mean to her.

Thankfully, Fielder recognizes that Holmes’ guilt has already been litigated. The story he tells is sparked by Holmes’ insistence on her version of the narrative. Fielder is best known as a comedian, and one suspects that Holmes and Evans had gauged him as a lightweight whom they could manipulate. Indeed, because Fielder is not a gotcha journalist, his curiosity leads him to unexpected insights.

As Holmes and Fielder undergo a battle of wits, she has the advantage of being unburdened by empathy. Fielder, in contrast, is empathetic and decent, but he is smart and skeptical.

You know the game we all played as kids, staring at each other until someone blinks? When Elizabeth Holmes protests her innocence, she is wide-eyed and does not blink. Right away, we semse Fielder finding this unnatural behavior to be significant and meaningful. And when she claims to never, in her whole life, have told a lie, Fielder refuses to let that go unchallenged.

We can see Fielder asking himself whether she has deluded herself in believing her most outlandish statement, or whether she is a bald-faced liar of unbridled chutzpah.

You Can See Everything is full of surprises, the biggest of which I will not spoil. But I will say that I didn’t expect Holmes’ baby daddy Billy Evans to emerge as a central element of the film. Evans is one of those really dumb guys who thinks he is the smartest person in the room, and he exposes himself as a greedy, narcissistic bully. While Holmes tries to control the narrative by guile, Evans is only equipped to deploy blunt aggression. Fielder clearly despises Evans (and Evans gave him more than enough justification). Billy Evans is the year’s most messed up movie character, and that includes the cyclops in The Odyssey.

You Can See Everything Now is a creative triumph for Nathan Fielder. Certainly, no one but Fielder would make such ingenious use of an Abbott and Costello clip. Fielder’s gift for observation results in a memorable moment, sparking audible audience reaction, over, of all thing, the whisking of eggs. And his inclusion of actress Amanda Seyfried, who won a Primetime Emmy for an unflattering portrayal of Holmes in the Hulu miniseries The Dropout, is transformative.

Put off by my own contempt for Elizabeth Holmes and by the three-hour running time, I wasn’t going to see You Can See Everything. I changed my mind when I read rapturous reviews, news reports of sold-out screenings and awards buzz. Indeed, I had to wait three days to see You Can See Everything, because even the matinee screenings at my local theater were sold out.

What about the three-hour length? I am generally in tolerant of movies that last more than 135 minutes, but You Can See Everything flew by, because Fielder keeps finding more aspects of the story to tell.

For the facts on the Theranos scandal itself, I strongly recommend the NYT opinion piece The Elizabeth Holmes Documentary, Through the Eyes of the Reporter Who Exposed Her by John Carreyrou, who exposed the fraud in the WSJ and wrote the book Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup. Carreyrou, who has won two Pulitzer Prizes, was skeptical of Fielder’s film before he saw it, but now admires it.

I also admire You Can See Everything for its originality and for its combination of engaging entertainment and profound insight. It’s certainly one of the Best Movies of 2026 – So Far.

Movies to See Right Now

Photo caption: John Tuturro in THE ONLY LIVING PICKPOCKET IN NEW YORK. Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics.

It’s Halloween Week on The Movie Gourmet, and I’ve recommended three scary European movies that you can watch at home:

  • Borgman: an adult scare for Halloween. Amazon, kanopy, hoopla.
  • Piggy: surprising and darkly hilarious. Amazon, kanopy, hoopla.
  • You Are Not Me: a nightmare at mom and dad’s. Amazon (included with Prime), kanopy.

I started the week with a new review of the more high-falutin’ psychological drama Queen at Sea.

REMEMBRANCE

Tom Skerritt in TOP GUN

I first noticed Tom Skerritt when he played Hawkeye and Trapper John’s fellow surgeon Duke in M*A*S*H*, and he is best remembered for his roles as Dallas in Alien and Viper in Top Gun. His 178 screen credits include prestige movies like The Turning Point, Steel Magnolia, and A River Runs Through It, and even the indie Smoke Signals.

CURRENT MOVIES

ON TV

Vincent Price and his co-star in THE TINGLER
Vincent Price and his co-star in THE TINGLER

Tonight, Turner Classic Movies is bringing us a campy Vincent Price horror classic from 1959, The Tingler. It has a scary premise – a parasite embedding itself in people’s spine and feeding on them – unaware until they feel a tingle AND THEN IT MAY BE TOO LATE! When finally revealed, the grown parasite is VERY scary-looking. Conveniently, the infested can weaken the parasite by screaming.

Halloween Week: YOU ARE NOT ME: a nightmare at mom and dad’s

Photo caption: Roser Tapias in YOU ARE NOT ME. Courtesy of Music Box Films.

In the Spanish psychological horror film You Are Not Me, Aitana (Roser Tapias) and her Brazilian partner Gabi (Yapoena Silva), with their adopted infant, show up early for Christmas at the Catalan home of Aitana’s affluent parents (Pilar Almeria and Alfred Pico). And Aitana seems to step into a nightmare. Or is it?

The first thing that rocks Aitana is her parents’ reaction. They don’t seem happy to see Aitana after many years, nor to meet her partner or their own first grandchild. They’re especially displeased that Aitana’s family has arrived on the eve of a dinner party they’ve planned, a special party that is not the usual family holiday get-together.

Why are the parents acting so inappropriately? Are they homophobic? Are they racist (the baby is black)? Are they still pissed off at Aitana? Aitana is headstrong and often tactless, and we learn that there’s some baggage; years before, the parents were hosting Aitana’s wedding to their ideal son-in-law, when Aitana, realizing she was a lesbian, suddenly ran away, leaving everyone in the lurch.

Aitana is also upset by the condition of her wheelchair-bound younger brother, Saul (Jorge Motos), whose degenerative disease is apparently getting worse.

But, what really sends Aitana over the edge is that her parents are fawning over a Romanian woman Aitana’s age, Nadia (Anna Kurikka). They have awarded Aitana’s room to Nadia, along with their affection and even Aitana’s wedding dress. When Aitana discovers evidence of Nadia’s dishonesty and even behavior that threatens Saul, the parents refuse to listen.

A scene from in YOU ARE NOT ME. Courtesy of Music Box Films.

Finally, there’s the parents’ formal dinner party, hosting several couples their age. The parents are meeting many of the guests, from several European countries, for the first time. The guests are unusually convivial (and horny). Although the guests are outwardly very traditional, they make what is a decidedly a creepy assemblage. Everything is conventional, but Aitana and the audience feel that something must be amiss.

You Are Not Me was co-written and co-directed by Marisa Crespo and Moisés Romera in their second feature film. It’s a well-directed film that benefits from a clever story that keeps the audience off-balance. Are these things really happening, or is Aitana imagining or dreaming them, or even hallucinating? Is Aitana just easily offended or is she paranoid or even schizophrenic? Her well-balanced partner Gabi is rolling with the punches and unintentionally gaslighting Aitana. By making Aitana so prickly, having her jet-lagged and then drunk, Crespo and Romera keep us wondering. And just when we think that the ending is outrageously cheesy, Crespo and Romera creep us out again.

You Are Not Me is streaming on Amazon (included with Prime) and kanopy.

Halloween Week: PIGGY: surprising and darkly hilarious

Photo caption: Laura Galán in PIGGY. Courtesy of Magnolia Pictures.

In the fresh and darkly hilarious Spanish horror movie Piggy, Sara (Laura Galán) is an overweight teenager cruelly teased by her peers. She works in her family’s butcher shop, which supplies her tormentors with a surfeit of unkind pork-related nicknames. Her affectionate but clueless dad and her brusque martinet of a mom aren’t much comfort.

One day, at the town swimming pool, mean girls sadistically traumatize her. Sara makes a shocking decision, and Piggy becomes a kind of Carrie meets Beauty and the Beast thrill ride as Sara is bounced along to the satisfying conclusion.

Piggy is the first feature for writer-director Carlota Pereda, a veteran television director. It’s based on her award-winning 2018 short with the same Spanish title, Cerdita, and also staring Galán. Galán gets all the teen angst and impulsiveness just right and, in a piñata-like role, is a helluva good sport.

Horror films turn on whether the protagonist can survive, and, often, on whether the victims deserve their demise; Pereda has a lot of fun with both.

I screened Piggy for the Nashville Film Festival, where it was one of my Under the Radar picks. Piggy is available to stream on Amazon, kanopy and hoopla. This movie is a hoot.

Halloween Week: BORGMAN: an adult scare for Halloween

Photo caption: Jan Bijvoet in BORGMAN

Technically, the Dutch thriller Borgman is a horror film, but it’s horror for adults, without the gore and with lots of wit. The shock doesn’t come from monsters unexpectedly lurching out of nowhere. The entertainment comes from the OMG moments of the “don’t ask the weird guy into your house!” and “don’t let the sinister guys watch your kids!” variety.

The setting is the architecturally striking and well-tended home of an affluent Dutch family and their Danish nanny. The husband is an aggro corporate schemer and a real scumbag – selfish, racist and chauvinistic, with the capacity for a violent rage. His wife Marina is repressed and neurotic. But they are highly functional until a homeless guy, Camiel Borgman, happens by, and circumstances compel them to put him up. Borgman feels entitled to more and more outrageous impositions – and soon it’s apparent that he’s even more sinister than he is obnoxious.

What if Charles Manson wasn’t a drug addled hoodlum, and his deranged charisma worked on the affluent mainstream? Borgman leads a crew of normal looking but murderous henchmen, who operate with the ruthless efficiency of Navy Seals. (Watch for the scar near the younger woman’s shoulder-blade.) Vaguely gifted with mind control, he can apparently create dreams by squatting naked and gargoyle-like above Marina while she slumbers with her husband. There is violence aplenty, but it tends to come through a bonk on the head or some poison in a glass.

Dark comedy stems from the matter-of-factness of the murders and body disposal (as in tossing corpses into a lake and then diving in for a relaxing swim). Every once in a while, there’s a hilariously sinister moment, like the supremely random appearance of some whippets that seem more like hellhounds.

BORGMAN

The acting is uniformly excellent, including the kids, but Jan Bijvoet as Borgman and Hadewych Minis as Marina are stellar.

Some questions are never answered (who are those three guys at the beginning and why are they hunting the homeless guys?). Is this a cult or aliens or what? The audience needs to accept some ambiguity. But the overall story arc is clear – no good is going to come of these people once they meet Camiel Borgman and his friends.

There is a subtext here: is this family so bourgeois that it deserves its fate? Fortunately, this subtext isn’t as in-your-face as in some recent self-loathing Eurocrap like Happy Days or Finsterworld, so it’s not at all off-putting. But Borgman can be enjoyed without going there at all.

Borgman is superbly written and directed by Alex van Warmerdam, a 62-year-old Dutch actor with only a handful of writing and directing credits.

I don’t often recommend a horror movie, but I’m all in on Borgman. Take it from me – you haven’t seen this movie before, and it’s endlessly entertaining. Borgman is available to stream from Amazon, kanopy and hoopla.