Zero Dark Thirty

Movies to See Right Now

by
ZERO DARK THIRTY

The enthralling Zero Dark Thirty tells the story of the frustrating, wearying and dangerous ten-year man hunt for Bin Laden – it’s a Must See.  The intelligent drama Rust and Bone is the singular tale of a complicated woman and an uncomplicated man.  Matt Damon’s stellar performance leads a fine cast in Promised Land, an engaging (until the corny ending) drama about exploitation of natural gas in rural America.  Not Fade Away is a pleasant enough, but unremarkable 60s coming of age story by The Sopranos creator David Chase and rocker Steven Van Zandt.

Like Zero Dark Thirty, Argo, Lincoln and Silver Linings Playbook are on my list of Best Movies of 2012. In Lincoln, Steven Spielberg and Daniel Day-Lewis push aside the marble statue and bring to life Abraham Lincoln the man. Argo is Ben Affleck’s brilliant thriller based on a true story from the Iran Hostage Crisis. The rewarding dramedy Silver Linings Playbook has a strong story, topicality and humor, but it’s worth seeing just for Jennifer Lawrence’s performance.

If, like me, you worship the spaghetti Western, the Quentin Tarantino blockbuster Django Unchained is gloriously pedal-to-the-metal, splattering exploitation. Also don’t overlook the solid thriller Deadfall that is flying under the radar this holiday season.

Ang Lee’s visually stunning fable Life of Pi is an enthralling commentary on story-telling. Denzel Washington stars in Flight, a thriller about the miraculous crash landing of an airliner and the even more dangerous battle against alcoholism. Skyfall updates the James Bond franchise with thrilling action and a more shopworn 007 from Daniel Craig.

Pass on the lavish but stupefying all star Les Miserables, with its multiple endings, each more miserable than the last. The FDR movie Hyde Park on Hudson is a bore. The disaster movie The Impossible is only for audiences that enjoy watching suffering adults and children in peril.

You can read descriptions and view trailers of upcoming films at Movies I’m Looking Forward To.

My pick for the best movie of 2012, The Kid with a Bike, is playing on the Sundance Channel three times on January 16-17. And next week Turner Classic Movies will be broadcasting the classic Western A Man Called Horse, Jack Nicholson’s most copmplex performance in Five Easy Pieces and a real curiosity, the 1933 anti-war movie Men Must Fight which predicts World War II with unsettling accuracy.

Zero Dark Thirty and torture

by
ZERO DARK THIRTY

A controversy has erupted relating to Zero Dark Thirty and its depiction of torture used by American intelligence forces in the War On Terror.  Critics of the movie assert that 1) the movie incorrectly shows that interrogations under torture helped track down Bin Laden and/or 2) the movie favors this application of torture.  Astoundingly, much of the criticism came before the release of the film and from people who had not seen it.

It is historical fact that, during the George W. Bush administration, American intelligence forces used “harsh interrogation techniques” on detainees, some of which (including waterboarding) constitute torture.  It is also well-established that torture is not an effective means of interrogation.  You can check with last month’s report by the Senate Intelligence committee (reported here) and these intelligence experts interviewed on NPR (and also here).

In my view, the torture used in these interrogations violated US and international law.   I also take the word of interrogation experts that torture is not effective because it does not produce reliable intelligence.  To end the torture, subjects will eventually say anything that they think that the interrogator wants to hear – whether true or timely or useful or not.   These experts say that more useful information is gained – without torture – by using skilled non-coercive interrogation techniques.

[SPOILER ALERT – the next few paragraphs contain key plot points.  If you haven’t seen the movie, you can skip to the last paragraph for my conclusion.]

So does Zero Dark Thirty incorrectly show that interrogations under torture helped track down Bin Laden?  The first hour of Zero Dark Thirty depicts the first years of the War On Terror, including several instances of interrogation with torture (which undeniably happened).  In the movie, one of the pieces of information secured through such an interrogation is a nickname for one of Bin Laden’s couriers – but this tidbit does not pay off.    But years go by without anyone capitalizing (or even verifying this lead).  Most of the intelligence agents even believe information from another detainee that the courier is dead.  In fact, years elapse and new leads come and go after the torture of detainees has ended.

Only in the ninth year of the man hunt, do the intelligence agents begin to close in by combining an overlooked tip on the courier’s family name, wiretapping the courier’s mother’s home phone, triangulating his cell phone calls (my favorite scenes in Zero Dark Thirty), putting a tail on the courier and satellite and drone surveillance of the compound.  Even with this, only the Jessica Chastain character rates more than a 60% probability on Bin Laden’s location.  All of this happens long after Zero Dark Thirty has shown the last of the torture – and after showing presidential candidate Obama pledging to end the practice when elected President.

Now, of course, non-critical thinkers in the audience may see torture at the beginning and the successful raid on Bin Laden at the end, and incorrectly connect the dots but, in my opinion the filmmakers cannot be held responsible for the lazy thinkers in the audience.  I conclude that Zero Dark Thirty does not show that the use of torture helped to locate Bin Laden.

And does Zero Dark Thirty favor the use of torture?   The torture scenes are realistic, and they are uncomfortable for the audience; they are not gratuitous.   In contrast, in the Dirty Harry movies, the audience roots for Harry when he shoots the bad guy in the kneecap to get information.  In Zero Dark Thirty, the filmmakers do not frame the scenes so the audience gets a kick out of the torture – even though the folks being tortured are the most despicable people on earth.  I have no problem with the filmmakers showing the use of torture – it did happen and it illustrates that, in the 9/11 aftermath, the American government would go to any means to get the terrorists.  Just because the filmmakers show stomach-turning torture does not mean that they endorse it.   I conclude that Zero Dark Thirty does not favor the use of torture.

Finally, I am very disappointed that many commentators and political leaders that I generally agree with jumped into the fray before they saw Zero Dark Thirty.  These are the same folks who, along with me, would not hesitate to ridicule the criticism of a film (e.g., The Last Temptation of Christ) by right wingers who hadn’t seen it.  In this case, their criticism of Zero Dark Thirty was both unfounded and unfair.

Zero Dark Thirty: a great director’s enthralling tale

by

Zero Dark Thirty is director Kathryn Bigelow’s inspired telling of the hunt for Bin Laden.  Bigelow, who won the directorial Oscar for The Hurt Locker, once again demonstrates an uncommon ability to enthrall.  She chose to tell the story of the frustrating, wearying and dangerous ten-year man hunt, not just the exciting raid in Abbottabad.

We should all be grateful that this movie was made with Bigelow’s directorial choices.  She is content to invest half of her screen time on false leads and wasted efforts – and makes them utterly gripping.  She neither lingers on the violence nor shies away from it.   In a scene where a CIA operative is looking for a man talking on a cell phone,  the camera pulls back to reveal that he is on a chaotic Pakistani street with hundreds of men on cell phones – perfectly conveying the needle-in-a-haystack aspect of the search.  As  the Navy Seal team returns from the successful raid, the music is deeply thoughtful and reflective, not the triumphalist anthem that many directors would have used.

Zero Dark Thirty contains realistic and non-gratuitous depictions of war, terrorism and torture. The movie is, to my sensibilities, not too uncomfortable for most viewers.   (Tomorrow I will comment on the torture controversy surrounding this movie.)

Jessica Chastain brilliantly plays the CIA analyst who doggedly and passionately pursues an unlikely lead that finally pays off after a ten-year grind.  I’ve already rhapsodized several times about Chastain’s sudden emergence as perhaps our best current screen actress.  She is profoundly gifted and can do anything.   Let’s just say that, as good as Zero Dark Thirty is, she carries it.

The rest of the fine cast includes Jason Clarke (Lawless), Joel Edgerton (Animal Kingdom), Jennifer Ehle (The Ides of March, The King’s Speech), Kyle Chandler (Friday Night Lights), Fares Fares (Safe House), Jeremy Strong (The Guard),  Mark Duplass and James Gandolfini.

I’ve added Zero Dark Thirty to my list of Best Films of 2012.